Study 2 - Preparation strategies for sign Language Conference interpreting: Comparing international sign with a national Sign Language

27 April 2021

In my second study of my PhD I focus on the preparation strategies for sign language conference interpreting, comparing International Sign and national sign language interpreters.

Wit, M. de, Crasborn, O. & Napier, J. (2021). Preparation strategies for sign language conference interpreting: comparing international sign with a national sign language. In K.G. Seeber (Ed.) 100 Years of Conference Interpreting: A legacy. Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Publisher >

Abstract

International Sign (IS) interpreting at conferences has been slowly becoming more common over recent decades, while still new within international institutions. However, little is known about IS interpreting. The few studies to date indicate that IS interpreting requires partly different skills and strategies to interpreting into a national signed language. This chapter reports on a comparative study of interpreting strategies between two teams of interpreters. The study analyses the interpreting strategies of a team of IS interpreters, contrasting them with a team of national sign language interpreters (NGT in this case), and looking specifically at how they prepare for an interpreting assignment. A reflexive thematic analysis shows that their preparation methods are very different: the IS team focuses on creating signed concepts whereas the NGT team primarily discusses terminology and using the correct NGT signs. This study provides further evidence that conference IS interpreting requires specific preparation.

Here you can also see the presentation of my preliminary results of this study in October 2019, including some samples of the video data >

More info about my PhD research >

If you have any questions please send me an email.
PhD research by Maya de Wit